Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: June 6, 2025

Jun 6, 2025 - 10:00 am
Search Video Recaps

Search News Buzz Video Recap: Google Ranking Movement, The Great Decoupling, Explicit Ranking Algorithm, Indexing Drop & AI, Lens, Ads & More

Jun 6, 2025 - 8:01 am
Google Ads

Google LSAs Tests Replacing Google Screened With Google Verified

Jun 6, 2025 - 7:51 am
Google Ads

Google Tests New Learn More About Sponsored Results Label

Jun 6, 2025 - 7:41 am
Google

Google AI Mode Adds Charting & Data Visualizations (Plus PR Stuff)

Jun 6, 2025 - 7:31 am
Bing Search

Google AI Overviews & Bing Copilot Answers With Shorts

Jun 6, 2025 - 7:21 am
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good